The Democratic Scorpion, or How We Sting Ourselves in Our Collective Ass

So the President’s running for re-election. That should come as no surprise to anyone. Most Presidents aspire to a second term. It’s only natural that Democrats should be pleased. Whatever you say, he’s accomplished a lot – more than his previous two Democratic predecessors.

So that’s that then. We should all rest happy in our beds. After all, we have a candidate, ready and waiting for whatever political personage the other side thinks to throw at us.

Only we’re not, are we? Come on, hands up, all you people, allegedly from the Left, who are wishin’ and hopin’ and thinkin’ and prayin’ for a great white hope to rise up from the ashes and primary the President.  Do I hear the Pumas wailing in the wilderness for Hillary to change her mind? How about Alan Grayson? He’s sending out duns for contributions, with the flyer “Elect Alan Grayson” attached – only he doesn’t say for what position he wants election. Do I hear Dennis Kucinich, preaching his interpretation of the Constitution to read that the President needs impeachment?

I was born two years into Eisenhower’s first term. I barely remember Kennedy’s election. I cast my first vote as an 18 year-old for George McGovern in his landslide defeat of 1972, during my first year at college.  I can honestly say that at no time during my adult life can I ever remember a Republican party in such abject disarray and without any cohesive direction or guiding principle other than to undo maliciously any and all previous work accomplished by the Democratic Party, and this President in particular, since the Obama Administration inherited the shitstorm left in the wake of George W Bush and his merry men.

Immediately after the 2008 election, the media, who purport to know these things better than we, pronounced the Republican party dead in the water and rotting. Less than a year later, however, that selfsame media were all over the phenomenon that was the Tea Party like the proverbial bad rash. We know now, even with the debacle that occurred in November 2010, that was all an illusion. They, the media, and their corporate masters wanted us to believe in the power of the populist movement on the Right, even whilst some amongst them were exposing the real corporate roots of the monster, and we swallowed it like a bloated trout swallows bait.

The Tea Party is and was as strong as the media made them. Fox hired their poster girl, Palin, but various and sundry so-called Leftwing pundits, even those who retreat behind a comedian’s mask, constantly gave this willfully ignorant woman more airtime than she deserved, never ceasing to cite her, almost on a daily basis. They leant credence to her shallowness and made her a force to be feared.

Certain areas of the Democratic party, instead of fighting back against the Tea Party and their rhetoric, all of which was based on Big Lie propaganda and the relentless promotion of it, sought to vent ceaseless criticism in the direction of the President, himself, remorselessly for the entire first two years of his tenure. At first, this exercise was piously explained as an effort to show the lock-step Right that the Left was free to criticize their leaders, when they deserved it; that this criticism was intended to be constructive and was entirely for the purpose of guidance. We were “holding his feet to the fire,” making him perform to our specifications. How many times did we hear this explanation?

We heard it so many times that we were unaware that we were actually criticizing absolutely everything the President did or didn’t do, parsing every word he uttered and then screaming every word we demanded that he say, but didn’t. Nothing he did was enough to the point that we got confused about what it actually was he was trying to do, and we confused ourselves to such a point that many of us ended up believing and still believe that he’s accomplished nothing. It’s so ridiculous that many on the Left are so graceless that they’d rather choke than admit when significant achievements are actually attained by the President in the way he sought to attain them.

It’s not the President’s fault that he addresses us as adults and expects us to respond in kind, when the majority of this country are spoiled children dependent upon instant gratification. Change you can believe in is often slow, almost imperceptible change, to the point that such change becomes the norm before anyone originally opposed to it realises anything is different. Slow change means lasting change.

So two years were wasted rounding on the President whilst a fringe element that actually embarrassed normal Republicans ran rampant. They were handed power in 2010, and now a lot of people – possibly many who voted for them – are experiencing buyers’ remorse. Just look at events unfolding in Wisconsin, Michigan and Indiana if you want proof.

Now, the Democrats are being handed what any sane person would recognise as a sure-fire victory in 2012 – a second term for the President, a chance to strengthen the majority in the Senate and to recapture the House.

Not only are the Republicans fielding a veritable ship of fools hoping to vye for the GOP nomination in 2012, they’re actually falling apart at the seams in the House they won last November.

At the moment, the potential Presidential candidate the GOP might offer the people could come from the likes of Sarah Palin, mistress of syntactical malapropism and eternal mean girl; Michele Bachman, history and geography revisionist, who would have us believe that the Founding Fathers didn’t rest until they’d eliminated slavery and that the first shot fired in our quest for independence occured in New Hampshire and not Massachusetts; Mike Huckabee, the “aw shucks” parson, who’d force us all at gunpoint to digest an intellectual diet administered by a sinister Dominionist faux history professor; Mitt Romney, commonly known as “Flipper,” but not as cute or clever; Newt Gingrich, trailing three wives and numerous ethics violations; Rick Santorum, homophobe; Herman Cain, living proof that a black man can aspire to the KKK; and Donald Trump, born-again birthe, corporationmeister and reality television star.

Did I forget anyone? Oh, yes! Tim Pawlenty, or rather PeeWee Herman pretending to be Tim Pawlenty, who panders to the Tea Party by introducing himself as “Tea-Paw.”

Pretty damned sickly, and in a normal world, the current President could easily beat anyone of that motley crew with a modicum of support from his party; but I seriously doubt he has such support – certainly from very few currently in residence on Capitol Hill and definitely not from a particular tranche of his own party.

Too many elected Democrats in both Houses have been too quick to demand that the President interpose himself directly in the job they’re elected to do – legislate. Like everyone else, they’re looking for a weird combination of Mr Goodbar crossed with Big Daddy. And the supporters keep on holding those Presidential feet to the proverbial fire.

We’re less than a week away from the first government shut-down since 1995. Most of us remember that. It left egg on the face of Newt Gingrich and proved, once more, that Bill Clinton really, really was the Comeback Kid.  But Bill Clinton’s not in the White House. We’ve got a President whom his own alleged supporters are too ready to blame for everything that goes wrong, aided and abetted by a shallow and deliberately misinforming media. More importantly, we’ve got a weak and timid Speaker, nursing a drinking problem that’s no real secret and desperately trying to perform responsibly whilst pandering to the fringe minority of his party which is proving to be the tail wagging the dog. If there’s a government shut-down, as much as some of us realise that the fault lies squarely with the intransigence of the Republicans, our media masters, with a little help from various and sundry elected Democrats and a lot of complaining from many of the Progressive base, will only make the GOP’s whine about the shut-down being all the fault of the Democrats a perceived truth.

The events of last week should have been an epiphany for the Left, but it wasn’t. On the one hand, we had Eric Cantor, the second-ranking Republican in the House of Representatives, introduce a bill that not only had a snowball’s chance in hell of passing, but also was blatantly unconstitutuional, as it purported to make legislation passed only in the House become the undisputed law of the land. When Cantor announced to an assembled press corps on Wednesday, his intent to introduce this legislation, not one member of the media covering Capitol Hill shouted out in protest against the total constitutional ignorance of such an act. More importantly, Cantor’s Speaker, John Boehner, stood silently in the background, to the right of Cantor, and expressed no surprise, no disbelief and no consternation at such a wantonly disgraceful act.

Indeed, the only media person who pursued this affront vociferously was Lawrence O’Donnell, who had formerly worked as a Congressional aide, and who obviously knew more about the real Constitution than anyone currently working in the media and certainly any elected official on Capitol Hill. When the bill was introduced on the floor of the House on Friday – appropriately April Fool’s Day – fourteen Republicans recognised it for the non-entity that it was, and voted against it, including such wingnuts as Ron Paul and Louis Gomert, the Gomer Pyle of government.

And speaking of the Pauls, Rand Paul was causing quite a stir, rivalling Dennis Kucinich, in darting to and fro, telling all and sundry about the illegality of the President’s participation in the Libyan no-fly zone initiative. Once again, O’Donnell stepped into the fray, the only media voice reminding people, again and again, that Rand had voted unanimously, along with the other 99 members of the Senate, on March 1st, on Senate Resolution 85, which called for the installation of an no-fly zone, for humanitarian reasons, over Libya. The Resolution was sponsored by such liberal lions as Chuck Schumer and Bernie Sanders. Rand Paul not only voted for this resolution, when an MSNBC producer actually rang his office to query this, she was met by a very young and very adolescent receptionist, being audibly coached in a blatant lie by a senior staffer, trying to justify the Senator’s support for this resolution as something that really didn’t count at all.

Instead of focusing on these totally dishonest and irresponsibly acts by the Republican party last week, instead of bringing them to the forefront in defiance of the media, the Progressive Left still nitpick, criticize and second-guess the President’s every move. It’s now come to the sorry situation that, if they don’t have a media stick with which to beat him about the head, they go about making stuff up. It seems they’ve learned well from Arianna Huffington, as much as they try to distance themselves from the ratfucker that she is. Some – at least one, blogging on the Daily Kos – have taken a leaf from Huffington’s Jayson Blair Journalist of the Year, Sam Stein, and created a potential situation from nothing more than the rantings of one Glenn Beck, who seems to be targeting Presidential advisor, Samantha Power, in a new witchunt.

In a blog posted on Daily Kos on Sunday entitled, “Obama, Don’t You ******* Fire Samantha Power!”, this person ranted and railed against the fact that, on the strength of Beck’s latest obsession, the President might even be thinking about sacking Power, when nothing in the media, not even by Stein, had emerged even speculating about this. And this came in the wake of yet another blogger demanding that Elizabeth Warren mount a primary campaign against the President.

I was weaned on the Democratic Party, by parents born with the Democratic gene as part of their DNA make-up. I seriously don’t know now, which is worse – the Tea Party blindly allowing themselves to guided to perdition by the Koch brothers, or the Progressive Left, espousing a hatred of all things Obama that would rival that of the Teabaggers. We really cannot see the forest for the trees.

If, for some reason, the White House is lost in 2012 – and that reason would most likely be a primary challenge – then the country really is lost. The scorpion is an insect which kills itself by repeatedly stinging itself to death with its tail, and that’s the sort of political suicide being effected by the Democratic party, especially when we continuously miss the lemons being thrown at us by the Republicans at our own expense. If the dark side regain the bully pulpit in 2012, we won’t see a Democratic party in power for a generation, and we’ll be increasingly demonised by corporatists and dominionists, whose intent is to create a theocratic nation of ignorant and undereducated serfs.

But ne’mind … we can always blame Obama.

Image from http://www.zimbio.com/Mohammed+Al+Fayed/articles/5/GREEDY+BANKERS+WANT+QUIT+THEIR+JOBS+GOOD+RIDDANCE

Print Friendly

Related posts:

facebook comments:


17 comments for “The Democratic Scorpion, or How We Sting Ourselves in Our Collective Ass

  1. April 6, 2011 at 7:52 am

    Great White hope? Because we disagree with Obama’s continuation of the wars and indefinite detentions and keeping Gitmo open, and so many other policies like the tax cuts for the rich that were part of Bush’s presidency? Thus we want a White Guy. That is an idiotic statement. I think Bush was much worse than Obama, does that mean I want a Mexican-American and don’t want a white candidate? (Although I would vote for Raul Grijalva in heart beat).

    Two things to see here:
    First, Cornel West stating the facts of our Corporo-Dem President: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HXj3_pjTTwg

    My post on Obama:
    http://texshelters.wordpress.com/2011/04/01/obama-is-not-like-bush-cause-i-said-so/

    Peace,
    Tex Shelters

  2. LR
    April 6, 2011 at 7:42 am

    Thank you for writing such an insightful article. You’ve summed up perfectly how I’ve been feeling for the last 2 years. Americans are basically spoiled brats who want everything overnight. Have we forgotten how close we were to a total catastrophe already; not to mention the one we’re close to having if Republicans gain majority in the senate? Is part of the problem that our president makes it look so easy that we start thinking it IS easy? Personally, I was scared out of my mind at the prospect of McCain being president with Palin one heart beat away and I thank Obama everyday for having the courage to lead this country. My 80 year old mother says he’s the best president she’s ever seen especially given the total pile of sh#t he was given from Bush. I feel very safe and secure with him in the driver’s seat and I’m completely invested in helping him succeed for the sake of my child. By not voting for Obama in 2012, who exactly do you think you’ll be punishing? Did Bush dumb down the presidency so much that it feels unsettling having an intelligent and wise man doing the job? By the way, I got EXACTLY the man I voted for – the condemnation coming from the liberal left is, quite franking, beyond annoying.

    • gloriap
      January 8, 2012 at 1:34 pm

      Absolutely 100 % correct …incontrovertibally ( SP?)correct !!

  3. April 6, 2011 at 2:29 am

    I have to agree with CJ to a point. Obama has come out more as a conservative and caved into the the GOP too many times, in an effort I suppose, to get something, anything done. Although I am disappointed in his progress on many issues and his presidency on the whole, I would still vote for him before any of those Republicans who are about to throw their hats into the ring.
    Not voting is why we lost so many seats in the House of Representatives last year, which has really placed the liberal agenda in peril. We must back the most liberal candidate, and like it or not, that candidate is President Obama.

  4. CJ
    April 5, 2011 at 5:51 pm

    Not for Obama anymore. He is nowhere close to as left as he should be……. It’s incredible how negatively Republicans talk about him even when he gives them everything they want. (Adding to that he did not close Guantanamo bay or come out in support of gays.)

    Obama’s a conservative now as far as I’m concerned. Can’t vote Republican, but can’t vote for this guy either.

    • Daniel Ennis
      April 5, 2011 at 6:40 pm

      Again to you too.. priorities…

      Fighting for gay rights is NOT going to help recover the country… He has to focus on the important, long term tasks that keep the country afloat.

      Gay rights is at the bottom of that chart.
      It needs to happen, but theres other things that need to happen first.

      • April 6, 2011 at 12:42 pm

        How much time and effort to does it take to say, “I believe in equal rights for women and men regardless of their sexual orientation.”

        We aren’t asking for the moon as the starts, just a little support.

        Peace,
        Tex Shelters

  5. George Miler
    April 5, 2011 at 1:04 pm

    Ever since the Great Baby Boomer sellout (phony leftists) and associated landslide victory of Reagan, the Democrats have been on the defensive ever since. The goal post on the left has been moved 90 yards to the right so there is scarcely any room for maneuver. I liked it better when Nixon was forced to act like a liberal.

    • April 13, 2011 at 1:31 pm

      Mr. Miller,

      Stop using facts and history to state reality!

      My effing contemporaries voted the mass murder of Central American campesinos into office and the Democrats have been kowed over since.

      Peace,
      Tex Shelters

  6. April 5, 2011 at 12:09 pm

    “If, for some reason, the White House is lost in 2012 – and that reason would most likely be a primary challenge – then the country really is lost.”

    No, the country isn’t ‘lost’. Not by that one action, and not by any other single-action.

    However, the country has, indeed, lost its sense of self over several decades – we can blame the educational system; the fact that the average American is a semiliterate, Hooterville-dwelling moron who’s more interested in NASCAR and American Idol than in the workings of the nation – but in the end we only need look as far as the mirror.

    The ‘two party system’ is nowhere in the nation’s foundational documents. We begin the slow-screw process on ourselves when we buy into that hogswill.

    We carry it further with the morally bankrupt conclusion that ‘the lesser of two evils’ is all we have by way of a vote.

    Here’s the juice: My high-school civics class taught me that a vote was personal; one person – one vote – and vote your conscience; whether that person ‘had a chance of winning’ was immaterial; what matters is that you voted your personal beliefs.

    That’s what I’m doing come this next election.

    You can bet that I won’t be voting for a pandering, caving type like Obama.

  7. Second Amendment Democrat
    April 5, 2011 at 12:01 pm

    I’d love to be able to agree with you, but I must say it’s a nice fairy tale the current admin is weaving, but it falls short of the actuality. The most important tasks for which we elected this man President have been totally ignored: criminal prosecution for the Bush cabal, closing of the torture camps and repeal of the tax breaks for Bush’s buddies foremost among them. Whatever else he has done is window dressing. The reason for this is simple: there is no more two-party system, the names are the same, but the game has changed; they are all aiming for the same goal. Jesse Ventura has spilled the beans – behind the scenes they are all on the same page.

    We are being rapidly turned into the first post-industrial nation by a concerted effort of the banking system and corporate unaccountable corruption. The banking crisis siphoned off what was available of funds for infrastructure maintenance and social programs, The home loan crisis allows the banks to wind up owning the majority of land in the US, which they will then plead poverty (again) and sell to the uber-rich for pennies on the dollar, completing the land and resources grab that has been underway since the 9/11 staged production (yes, staged production. If all those investors knew, ’nuff said…)

    We MUST create a viable third party of small business owners, labor and service industry people who will agree to vote as a bloc to overturn the power play. But I’m afraid indifference and absorption by the Dems will kill such a party before it can make headway.

    We were fooled once by his Democratic posturing, silver tongue and racial heritage. PLEASE don’t let him fool you again. He is one of them, and does not care AT ALL about the rest of us.

    • Daniel Ennis
      April 5, 2011 at 6:36 pm

      You really “Elected him president” for those specific reasons alone?

      I thought we elected him to turn this country around in a whole… which hes been doing a great job at doing.

      Do you really think its easy (and should be a top priority over stabalizing the economy… ?) to try to persecute the bush admin?

      Do you not keep up with the news either? You do realize the bush tax cuts were used as blackmail right? Obama had to make a choice for the greater good, and while I wish they would of been able to go too, he made the right choice. Priorities…

      You have to stabalize the economy before you can recover it. Unemployment benefits and SS tax cuts that help the poor/middle class greatly was much more important than removing the bush tax cuts, which would not have an immediate effect on the economy. not to mention some employers are going to fire people as a result of losing their tax cuts, so we really have to be stable before they go.

      And as for gitmo, its easy to say hes going to shut it down in his first year, but when you become president, you gain alot more confidential knowledge… maybe he found out something that made it difficult to shut it down asap.

      The man knows wtf hes doing. Stop being a tea bagger and just let the man do his job.

      Just cause he doesnt do things in the order you want them done, doesnt mean hes doing a bad job.

      it takes time.

    • April 5, 2011 at 7:05 pm

      Sorry this isn’t related to the comment you left, but I see you on here all the time, and I’m wondering about the name you use. When you call yourself “Second Amendment Democrat,” what, pray tell, do you mean by that?

      • BJL
        April 6, 2011 at 4:26 am

        I suspect he’s a Libertarian.

        • BJL
          April 6, 2011 at 4:49 am

          He OR she, that is…for what it’s worth.

    • April 6, 2011 at 7:54 am

      Yes, it’s just window dressing SAD. You might enjoy my take on the Obama Presidency thus far.

      http://texshelters.wordpress.com/2011/04/01/obama-is-not-like-bush-cause-i-said-so/

      Hey, I wish Obama well, not Bush. But, I have lost faith and hope.

      Peace,
      Tex Shelters

      • gloriap
        January 8, 2012 at 1:39 pm

        Too bad for you, Tax ….that is a very depressing statement….anyone who has lost faith and hope…is in very bad shape…I feel sorry for you

Leave a Reply