When you look at the H.R. 358 bill, which is known as the “Protect Life Act” to conservatives, but is known as the “Let Women Die Act” to progressives and reasonable people, it’s easy to see why it has caused a firestorm based on the Republican led efforts to whittle away a woman’s right to seek out an abortion when her life could be in danger, and there is one thing that comes to mind, and that is the never ending nerve of conservatism to try and dictate what the rap group Naughty By Nature referred to as ‘O.P.P.,’ which is better known as other people’s property or other people’s p-word, which is the p-word that’s a synonym for kitty-cat! Now how fitting is that analogy, because it is politically obvious that the male-driven, conservative ideology is more than cool with at least two things—’O.P.P.’ and Viagra?
In a political party made up almost entirely of grumpy, old men who are terminally allergic to taxes, change, diversity overall, and non-White presidents, it’s fairly easy to comprehend why so many people, especially women, are often saying to themselves: ‘Why can’t these annoying, old geezers find something more constructive to do with their domineering time, like finding new, tax loopholes for shady businesses and Wall St. hooligans to slip through or begging Sarah Palin to run for president or pop out of a Ronald Reagan cake,’ but the grumpy, old conservatives are not alone.
There were fifteen Democrats in the House of Representatives who also voted in support of the bill; Congressmen such as: Jason Altmire (PA), Sanford Bishop (GA), Dan Boren (OK), and Jerry Costello (IL). This is a prime example of why you don’t send a Reagan Democrat to a Tea Party/Republican fight, because they won’t scorn the movement, they’ll probably just join the movement. It just goes to show how the male ego angrily and arrogantly beating on its manly, dictating chest is definitely a bipartisan activity, and it’s just too bad that it might be the only one. When it comes to Democrats, it’s one thing to cave on an issue, but it’s even worse when they help the knuckle dragging, foot dragging, Neanderthal conservatisms actually build the man-cave, and then assist the good-old-boys in trying to push the competency of women backwards and farther into it.
This H.R. 358 bill is being brought to you by Rep. Joe Pitts, a Republican from Pennsylvania, who hails from that most prestigious club known as the House Republicans; the same group that gave us such forgettable numbers as the debt ceiling dance, the party of no shuffle, and the credit downgrade ditty. And if you couple all of this with the fact that Speaker of the House John Boehner has presided over the passage of this legislation during this all-important jobs and debt era, it paints a detailed account of the differences between what Republicans say politically and what Republicans do politically. And with far more pressing matters at hand, the famed House Republicans have reverted back to their old tricks again of trying to dictate their personal ideologies onto you, onto me, and onto the sanctity of the womb, with a pack of Blue Dog, Reagan Democrats wagging their tails behind them!
Women seeking emergency abortions aren’t the ones shipping jobs to China, and they aren’t the ones who have engulfed the economy in a drowning pool of debt either. So why are we allowing old-dogs with even older tricks to, once again, attempt to saw a woman in half? Any attempt to redefine the meanings of words or phrases like rape or life-threatening emergency is a theological, pandering abuse of political power.
First, the conservatives say they want to make the government inconsequential in our lives, but then they turnaround and attempt to use the government to create new consequences in our lives, as it relates to a woman’s rights to choose. Trying to redefine justice to the point where women are denied based on personalized ideology is a ragtag excuse for Americanism, but it is an impeccable inclination of incompetent idiocracy, and it should be repealed if signed into law with the same earnestness that the Republicans have in their yearning to repeal Obamacare, even though President Obama has vowed to veto this “Let Women Die” legislation.
Apparently, this H.R. 358 legislation introduces the strong possibility that hospitals would be able to become Pro-Life, hall monitors with the ability to deny any woman entry into the abortion care, services center whenever they conservatively feel like it. Now based on this potential reality, it won’t be Obamacare rationing out care based on a frugal, governmental response. It will be hospitals rationing out their political, religious, and personal moralities on patients based on the premise of an overreaching federal government hell-bent on doing its best Jonestown impersonation at the hands of modern day Puritans poorly disguised as Republicans in general. While conservatives whine about socialism, they’re about to give everyone their elite, country club notice according to the H.R. 358 legislation that reads: ‘No abortions will be performed here under any circumstances. We just don’t serve your kind, and we will not facilitate your quest for someone who will!’
And since the total elimination of abortions overall is the true goal of the conservative motto, self-righteously standing by and denying care to women who may desperately need an abortion is just an underhanded way to try and move the goal post in that direction! Raging political, war games over the rights and the contents of someone else’s body is not politically persuasive. It’s politically unacceptable, and trying to sell the ideology that it’s okay to preserve life on one hand, while enabling the possibilities of death on the other is not noble by any stretch of the imagination, but it is dangerously, irresponsibly, chauvinistically, and narcissistically insensitive and narrow-minded!
If the only jobs that conservatives can muster are their unapproved, unwelcome, unscrupulous entanglements into the policing of which lives are worth saving and which lives are worth abandoning based on the conservative interpretations of the Americanized, Christian, God doctrine, it’s not only our work environments that are chronically unemployed, but it is also our judgments that have become chronically unemployed—unemployed of decency, freedom, and basic, gender understandings.
And, this is why many progressives consider legislations like the H.R. 358 bill as just another Neanderthal shot fired across the bow of the ongoing, conservative sponsored War on Women, while conservatives continue to do everything within their power to manifest this antiquated, rationed role of the traditional woman’s, kitchen and bedroom, role in the world of the good-old-days, as designed by the self-appointed domineering of the good-old-boys. The notion that all women will, one day, be at the pearly gates of heaven waiting for their turn to get in, when Jesus Christ and or God steps forward and asks them something along these lines: “Were you a good, little, conservative breeder, or did you have a big government, liberalized, emergency abortion? Well, I’m sorry to inform you, but this country club is for smaller government and breeders only. You’ll have to join the liberal, country club DOWN the street, with a special emphasis on the word DOWN,” is about as close to the old Salem Witch Trials as any of us should ever want to be politically.
Now just because some groups seem to be more determined than ever in trying to dictate their Americanized God doctrine on society, it does not mean that they should try to legislate it though some sniveling, back alley deal to underlyingly install a no democracy for the womb precedent, because it only raises the question that if you can’t trust a woman to make the right decisions about her body, how can you honestly trust a woman to make the right decisions about anything—governing in particular, and this is where religion and conservatism have failed and where liberalism has, at least, tried to make a more positive difference in recognizing a woman’s right to graduate from the kitchen, the bedroom, the Bible, and man’s ever widening, historically blocking shadow, when and if she so desires.
Related posts:
If you liked this article, share it:
Written by: Bryian Revoner on October 20, 2011.
Last revised by: Matthew Desmond
Author: Bryian Revoner
Welcome to the ideology of the Realacrats, where the anticipation of the future defeats the reminiscence of the past, where the dreams of one can change the lives of all, where understanding is a gift that can only be understood when it is applied, where we realistically search for what we will realistically find, and where the narrative you write will be penned in the ink of your own individuality. We will not ask that you believe in God, but we will ask that you believe in yourself, because many of the treasures we seek lie hidden in plain sight, but blinded eyes led by filtered ears will prevent many from finding them. Realacrats will ensure that it does not prevent all, for the fear of being challenged will not go unchallenged by what will come to be known as the Realacrat ideology! I am Independently Democratic, and I am Democratically Independent. I am the Realacrat, and this is the Realacratic mission statement!
~The Fear of Being Challenged
This is the website, www.iuniverse.com/Bookstore, where The Fear of Being Challenged is on sale now as an E-book for $9.99, and I implore everyone who is interested to go the E-book route, because the actual book is much higher in price. All you have to do is go to that website and enter the title or my name in the iUniverse search engine, and you will be able to see or buy the book. Again, I suggest the E-book.
The Fear of Being Challenged, Democratically Independent; I Am the Realacrat! That is the title of the book in my profile picture. The actual book is not yet completed, but the E-Book is available through iUniverse, just in case there is anyone out there who wants to know about this. As many of you know, I wrote a few articles and essays on Facebook. I was splitting time between writing my articles, and writing my book. Sometimes I would work on both projects simultaneously. I was forced to do all of this independently, because none of the publishers liked what I had to offer. Many of them said that I was too radical, too controversial, too naïve, too hopeful, too political, not political enough, too liberal, not liberal enough, too conservative, not conservative enough, too pro-Black, not pro-Black enough, too anti-White, too welcoming to Whites, too inclusive, not inclusive enough, to pro-Democratic, not Democratic enough, too anti-Republican, not critical enough of Republicans, too partisan, not partisan enough, too ideologically simplistic, too ideologically complex, too rudimentary in sentence structure and thought progression, and too multidimensional in sentence structure and thought progression.
So if I had to summarize the entire body of work; based on all of these different elements of assessment, I’d theorize that the prodigious sentiment connecting them all would have to be the intrinsic polarization of the differentiations of a highly-induced opinionatedness that cannot be collectively avoided by the reader, which means that in all likelihood; this venture will not be a boring one under any stretch of the imagination! I can’t sit here and convince you that I am able to solve all of the world’s problems within the confines of this book, but I will attempt to convince you that the cognitive absorption of this material will stir the emotional stew that boils within you. I’ll admit that this is not a "Kum Ba Yah" moment, and I’ll admit that this is not a Bryian R., feel-good, fan club convention either. I didn’t write it to keep you as a friend, and I didn’t write it transform you into an enemy, but I did write it to inspire you to think about your dreams and to coax you into re-evaluating your fears of being challenged, because no matter how much of a bad ass we all would like to be; everyone has feared the challenged on some level!
Outside of the Facebook world, I was continuously confronted with this mass confusion regarding the ideology of my subject matter, from the numerous publishers that I submitted it to, to the many editors who stated how they just didn’t like the way that I write or the way that I idealize. I had publishers and editors who loved me and published many of my articles, but I also had the same number of publishers and editors who despised me and eventually overrode other publishers and editors and even yanked many of my already published articles.
For example, I was writing for this organization as an Op-Ed, and I had a couple of articles published through that organization. After about the third article, one of the higher ranking editors sends me an email explaining why he yanked my articles. He said to me: “I’ve got news for you buddy! Just because you’ve been given the nod of approval by our editing staff, it does not mean that you’ve been given the nod of approval by me! They accepted your material, but I am now rejecting it, and I have the power to overrule the entire editing staff. So your little run here is done! I suggest that you create a diary for the kind of work that you do, because it’s too personal! No one cares about your personal ideologies, your personal views, or your personal experiences. You simply are not that important to anyone outside of yourself.”
And for the record, the subject matter that was in question was entitled “Conversation with a Tea Bagger,” which was published on Facebook and is in The Fear of Being Challenged. Ironically, there were other book publishers, who eventually turned me down about the Fear of Being Challenged, who voiced similar complaints about what I do in a writing capacity. Like many of my Op-Ed critiques, book publishers that I attempted to woo were also highly-uncomfortable about what they referred to as my ‘over-the-top, narcissism’ of my own self-worth. One of the publishers said to me: “Who in the hell are you to be espousing such rhetoric? Who do you think you are? You’re not Rush Limbaugh or Sarah Palin. You not Obama! Your rhetoric speaks as if it’s coming from somebody who’s significantly boisterous, but the lack of recognition surrounding your bland name speaks to the exact opposite! You have achieved nothing that would afford you the luxury of trying to conjure up such leadership qualities, and you certainly have no legitimate reasons to believe that you deserve any form of an audience. You’re, sir, are a nobody! You’re not Malcolm X, and you’re no Dr. King. Those guys were famous. You are not. You think you have an ideology, but trust me, my friend, when I say this to you. You will never end up sitting on Oprah’s couch with these unrealistic, yet honorable, ideas you’ve concocted. It’s obvious that you’ve put a lot of thought into this project, but surely you weren’t gullible enough to actually believe that you could be heard,” and then they laughed at me, and hung up on me.
This is precisely why I sub-titled this book “Democratically Independent; I Am the Realacrat,” because in my view; the power of realism allows anyone to be a Democratically Independent Realacrat; meaning, the realities of our existences affords all of us the right to engage the freedoms of our democracy through the paths that we choose and the right to individually and independently question and theorize the universe that surrounds us on those paths. And in my opinion, you don’t have to be anyone, outside of the person that you are, to be a part of a genuine, authentic participation, because I don’t believe that worldly possessions, abstract or physical, are tangible enhancers of the human perception. I think the potential character of the human DNA is priceless; regardless of the number of followers who get behind it. If there is one thing that I have learned from all of this, it’s that everyone has a voice that deserves to be heard, but the availability of the megaphones tend to be more elitist, but the absence of a megaphone should not mean the absence of your voice. It might not be as loud, but that in no way means that it is any less important, whether you’re a truck driver, a ditch digger, the Governor of Alaska, or the President of United States. If the Constitution or the Founding Fathers intended to imply anything at all, that notion has to be it, because there is nothing American or Democratic about the selectiveness/elitism of opportunistic distribution through genetic or ideological entitlements.
I haven’t done anything in this book that all of you are not capable of doing on your own, which is seeing the world through my eyes, and describing the possibilities of that world in my words. It’s a process that I would like to see more people get involved with on a major level. Some of the best things in our lives have often arisen from those unlikely contenders and contestants who weren’t lucky enough or popular enough to be awarded a pageant crown or a megaphone. When we allow ourselves to become mesmerized by the proverbial Red Herring, we can easily become blinded to the undecorated usefulness of common sense. As a Realacrat, I try hard not to fall into that trap.
Now politically, I touch on everything that’s underneath the political sun, from Israel and Palestine to Rush Limbaugh and President Obama. I talk about Women’s Rights, American jobs, Democrats and Republicans, green technology, religion, racism, sexism, homosexuality, poverty, street gangs, abortion, the failing education system, immigration reform, the War on Drugs, the War on Terror, the size and relevance of government as a whole, September 11th, China, the middle-class, the media, all-around hypocrisy, and the Fear of Being Challenged on many levels.
This was only intended for my friends on Facebook. I never had any intentions of going national or worldly with this Realacrat ideology. I only had in mind to share my views with all of you, not necessarily the entire world. So no, I haven’t had any hopes of ever sitting on Oprah’s couch. I’m not Sarah Palin, and I’m not Glenn Beck. I’m just an obscure individual from Facebook, and I’m realistic enough to accept that. Unfortunately, it’s not the relevance of the ideology held by the individual. It’s the relevance of the individual that holds the ideology, and that’s just the world that we live in. I’m not naive enough to believe that I can change it, but I’m also not naïve enough to allow it to change me, by convincing me that I have to accompany it, and that is the crux of being a Realacrat and the antithesis of the Fear of Being Challenged! In the end, you will leave with more than you arrived with if you decide to challenge the Fear of Being Challenged if you decide to read this book. It’s not perfectly done, but it’s ideologically as good as I could make it as an independent author.
The fear of being challenged was really the fear of someone else’s success, the fear of my own possible defeat, and the fear of losing my influential grip. As long as I had the entire world playing from my rigged deck of cards, I was always in complete control of who won and who lost, which is actually a fear of the freedoms of democracy and the fear of being challenged! Scripted-Capitalism is a very lucrative venture for the person who writes the script, but it crumbles like the Berlin Wall when a new script is introduced, because someone dared to seek change!
~The Fear of Being Challenged
Bryian R.
I’d rather learn about all of the things that I fear, instead of fearing all of the things that I could learn! ~The Revoner
I’d rather walk alone with the truth, as opposed to leading the crowd with a lie! ~The Revoner
7:48 pm
Abortion: Assassination of guiltless and defenseless life.
6:01 pm
to the “pro-life” crowd: WHAT A WOMAN DOES WITH HER BODY IS NONE OF YOUR FUCKING BUSINESS!! DEAL WITH IT. You have enough problems staying married to each other…concentrate on YOUR relationships…
11:15 am
These jokers are going to have their HEADS handed to them. VOTE THEM OUT. MY body, MY life, MY CHOICE. I dare any one of these $$$holes to look me in the eye and tell me that the embryo in my body is MORE IMPORTANT THAN MY LIFE. Look me STRAIGHT IN THE EYE and tell me that!!
As WC Fields (?) once said (paraphrase): Your right to swing your cane ENDS AT THE TIP OF MY NOSE. Period, end of story.
GEESH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
4:46 am
These masses of male species want to set laws about a Woman’s UTERUS and Giving Birth, NEITHER of which “They” hold NO Personal Experience In NOR is there ANY Risk to Their Penis or Life….hummmm…Yet we carry all the burden, have all the real life experience and put Our Life at Risk…now this is suppose to makes sense to me as a woman how???
I suggest for men who feel so damn strongly about abortions, they should all really take up the Cause by rallying all males who are Pro-Life and start promoting vasectomies! Opening & funding Male V-Clinics next to every bar and strip joint in every state. That is one way Men can control what comes out of OPP aka OUR UTERUS! WE can’t have them without your MALE INPUT buddy!. So you want to End Abortion – Start with YOUR MALE Body Parts!IMHO
9:21 pm
How low can they go? Why do they hate women so much?!