How To Cure The Autism Epidemic? Make Believe It Doesn’t Exist.

Author: January 20, 2012 8:47 pm

In their infinite wisdom, the American Psychiatric Association is, after almost two decades, updating the medical definition of autism and by “updating” I mean “narrowing.” It almost appears that, in a misguided attempt to deal with the increasing rate at which autism is being diagnosised, they have decided to exclude a great deal of the less extreme cases of autism by simply claiming they do not actually have autism.

Autism. The word summons up images of Dustin Hoffman in Rain Man and of children that appear almost catatonic. The public’s understanding of autism has not progressed much since then and that’s not necessarily the public’s fault. The causes of autism are still mostly unknown. Its effect on children (and the adults they become) varies wildly from case to case and there’s no single “treatment.” If the people that have been studying it for decades don’t fully understand such basic information themselves, can we really expect the general public to understand it? Probably not.

However, there’s nothing stopping the public from being better educated about the difficulties and challenges involved with being a parent raising autistic children. The media has reported that autism is “spreading” as if it were a communicable disease but the reality is more that, as our grasp of what autism entails grows, we are finding that there are more children that fall into that category. For this reason the term “autism spectrum disorder” was created to encompass all of the various facets. An imperfect analogy would be that of several people missing various limbs. One is missing a foot, another a leg, a third, both arms. All have considerably different levels of difficulties to deal with, yet all are still amputees.

But, if the new definitions are adopted, the guy missing a foot won’t be an amputee anymore.

Bullshit. From the NYTimes:

The changes would narrow the diagnosis so much that it could effectively end the autism surge, said Dr. Fred R. Volkmar, director of the Child Study Center at the Yale School of Medicine and an author of the new analysis of the proposal. “We would nip it in the bud.”

How is redefining a problem so it’s no longer “officially” a problem actually helping anyone?

If you’ve followed me for a while you’ll know that i have an autistic son, Jordan. Sweetest child ever. Not a mean bone in his body. But at just shy of his fourth birthday, Jordan cannot speak. He does not play with other children or make regular eye contact. His physical development is delayed; he still has difficulty walking down stairs or climbing a ladder at the playground. He can understand what is being said to him but is almost completely unable to communicate with others. All classic symptoms of autism.

However, Jordan does not display several other classic symptoms such as repetitive behaviors like rocking back and forth or flapping his hands. He is not obsessed with spinning wheels or lining objects up over and over. For this reason, the new definitions would exclude Jordan from a diagnosis of autism and possibly cutting him off from vital services.

There’s a reason it’s called “autism SPECTRUM disorder.” Some people are severe cases while others are not as impaired. This does not mean those on the lower end don’t need help. I’m a fairly bright person and so is my wife. Yet neither of us is under the illusion that we can pick up a few books and tackle this ourselves. Jordan’s therapists are trained professionals and we need them to help our son. I’ve discussed this before in a slightly different context but the point is the same: your average parent cannot possibly afford to pay for private therapists and simply do not have the skill set required to do it themselves.

So what happens when the official guidelines exclude my son? Do I just throw up my hands and say “Oh well! I guess he’s a perfectly normal kid because someone who has never met him says so?” Ridiculous.

The good news, according to the Irish Wench (mother of three kids on the spectrum and newly minted American citizen and my go to source for all things autism related) is the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (fifth edition) is only a guideline and is not binding on city or state municipalities. If Jordan is determined (by people who will actually sit and interact with him) to still require services, he will continue to get them.

The bad news is that if the city pressures the schools to cut services, they’ll go after the least afflicted first. Mind you, these are the same people that suggested we cut speech therapy completely. We only had it reinstated after explaining, loudly, that Jordan did not speak. At all. Not a single word or intelligible sound. THIS is what parents with autistic children have to deal with. And now it’s going to get so much worse.

Read more about it here.

Feel free to tell me what a terrible person I am on Facebook here (public) or here (not so public) or follow me on Twitter @FilthyLbrlScum.



Help us get the word out!
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on StumbleUponShare on RedditPin on PinterestShare on LinkedInShare on TumblrEmail this to someone

facebook comments:


  • So what shall we do with the money we save? Have bigger and better wars?

  • To use your own example, the guy missing a foot isn’t always an amputee; he may have been missing that foot from birth. That doesn’t suddenly mean he has a foot, or doesn’t need treatment, the label just never should have been applied to him in the first place. The problem he has is similar, but different.

    Autism advocates, among whom I am, have fought for many years and made great strides in getting these disorders recognized as requiring services, and this shouldn’t set them back one step. If anything, it should bolster them, as difficulties in determining a diagnosis are reduced, and treatments become less expensive to provide as they become more well defined and more pervasive.

    What the APA are trying to do is make the diagnoses of people on the spectrum more accurately, which is precisely what they’re SUPPOSED to do as doctors. They’re trying to improve the criteria, because that in turn leads to improved treatments.

    What they are NOT doing, and what you misstate, is making these changes so that people with higher-functioning disorders are left out in the cold with no diagnosis. Do you really think that’s what doctors do? No, it isn’t. They’re ultimately making sure that when you get treatment, you get the right treatment. Period.

  • My son who is now 18 was diagnosed with Asperger’s at age 6 (in 1999) I can not imagine life without the diagnosis. Prior to the diagnosis, I was judged. With the diagnosis, I found my voice and had some medical teeth to advocate for my son. He is now in college getting his degree in game design. I thought the greater awareness was a good thing, could never have anticipated the backlash resulting in the abandonment of this HUGE group of human beings. Very very sad.

  • I strongly recommend that you look into the Son-Rise program at the Option Institute in Massachusetts, if you haven’t already. They had a severely autistic son Raun, and developed an amazing award-winning program that has helped hundreds of autistic children (I believe Raun runs it these days.) I spent two months there years ago in an unrelated program and witnessed what I can only call miracles; if I hadn’t been there and actually seen it with my own eyes, I never would have believed it. Their website is

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.