Ron Paul’s Former Secretary Confirms That Paul Proofread His Newsletters

Author: January 27, 2012 12:21 pm

Ron Paul has served in Congress for 23 years. In today’s electoral system, 12 successful campaigns for Congress mean two things…yes, the voters like him, but he is also good at  raising the necessary money to get elected, an exercise that unfortunately requires politicking. Yet his followers would have you believe that Paul lives in a rarefied world where he keeps his fingers clean and his morals pure.

If you are still convinced that Paul is above the dirtiest, most disgusting and pandering kind of politics, perhaps you’d listen to his former secretary and current follower, Renae Hathway.

During the 90s, Ron Paul’s office released a series of newsletters, many of which were highly inflammatory and racist, with quotes such as these:

“If you have ever been robbed by a black teen-aged male, you know how unbelievably fleet-footed they can be.” – Ron Paul, 1992

“Given the inefficiencies of what D.C. laughingly calls the `criminal justice system,’ I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal.” – Ron Paul, 1992

“We don’t think a child of 13 should be held responsible as a man of 23. That’s true for most people, but black males age 13 who have been raised on the streets and who have joined criminal gangs are as big, strong, tough, scary and culpable as any adult and should be treated as such.” – Ron Paul, 1992

“What else do we need to know about the political establishment than that it refuses to discuss the crimes that terrify Americans on grounds that doing so is racist? Why isn’t that true of complex embezzling, which is 100 percent white and Asian?” – Ron Paul, 1992

Paul’s campaign doesn’t deny the existence of the newsletters, just his involvement. As it turns out, Paul might not have written the newsletters but according to Hathway, he did read them and in fact, he proofread them. From the Washington Post:

“It was his newsletter, and it was under his name, so he always got to see the final product. .?.?. He would proof it,’’ said Renae Hathway, a former secretary in Paul’s company and a supporter of the Texas congressman.

The Post also reports that:

It is unclear precisely how much money Paul made from his newsletters, but during the years he was publishing them, he reduced his debts and substantially increased his net worth, according to his congressional and presidential disclosure reports. In 1984, he reported debt of up to $765,000, most of which was gone by 1995, when he reported a net worth of up to $3.3 million. Last year, he reported a net worth up to $5.2 million.

They quoted an anonymous source within Paul’s organization:

A person involved in Paul’s businesses, who spoke on condition of anonymity to avoid criticizing a former employer, said Paul and his associates decided in the late 1980s to try to increase sales by making the newsletters more provocative. They discussed adding controversial material, including racial statements, to help the business, the person said.

“It was playing on a growing racial tension, economic tension, fear of government,’’ said the person, who supports Paul’s economic policies but is not backing him for president. “I’m not saying Ron believed this stuff. It was good copy. Ron Paul is a shrewd businessman.’’

So it’s not clear that Paul actually believes the racist tripe printed in his newsletter, but he was all about taking responsibility for it when he was collecting the checks. At worst, he’s racist. At best, his values are on the auction block, just like the politicians he holds himself above.

Help us get the word out!
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on StumbleUponShare on RedditPin on PinterestShare on LinkedInShare on TumblrEmail this to someone

facebook comments:


  • Even if Paul is as innocent of the content of the newsletters as he claims to be, that would mean that:
    a)He didn’t know what his employees were doing in his name
    b)He allowed outrageous statements to be attributed to him with which he disagreed and did nothing to correct that until he was challenged with it as a presidential candidate decades later
    c)He is now dodging responsibility, rather than accepting it, not only for the content of the letters but also for his failures as a manager, if his disavowals are to be believed.
    These failures alone disqualify him for the office of president. A President must above all:
    a) Be a competent manager
    b) Know what his subordinates are doing on his watch
    c) Take responsibility

  • Look, the entire anti-government movement is really about race. No one is opposed to government when it is of, for, and by people like them. But when government is perceived as protecting the interests of “others,” suddenly it’s too much government. Of COURSE Paul pandered to racists. And it is almost certain that if you got him going after a couple of drinks, among friends, his racial views would be ones that would not stand the light of day.

  • What’s the difference between Ron Paul and any other politician caught in a lie?

    Nothing at all, he just denies, denies, denies.

  • What a cheesy photo. LOL!!!

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.