Ron Paul Wants To Sell Yellowstone (VIDEO)

Author: February 8, 2012 1:54 pm

Some of my favorite childhood memories were family road trips (at least when I wasn’t fighting with my brother). We visited the Grand Canyon, Yellowstone and Glacier National Monument. We spent many weekends in Rocky Mountain National Park. If Ron Paul has his way, these treasured National Parks will be gone, or at least sold to the highest bidder.

In a Nevada campaign stop, Paul addressed the issue of the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste dump, an idea that’s almost universally disliked in Nevada and for good and pretty obvious reason.

From Think Progress:

Paul:  I want as much federal land to be turned over to the state as possible—the regulatory approach to tell people how to do and what to say.  So I was essentially other than the other members of Congress from this state — I very early on opposed the dumping of nuclear waste in Nevada, so I want the state to make a decision—

Questioner:  This plan pertains to using ATVs and things like that on federal land.

Paul:  Well, I’d be opposed to that.  I don’t want the federal government dictating to Nevada, period.  I’d rather see the land owned and controlled by the states.


 Here’s the video:

Ron Paul is really great at identifying problems within the government and I’m sure that that’s a lot of his appeal. Unfortunately, his perennial meme of handing everything off to the states or worse, to the private sector, solves nothing. It’s like telling someone with a sprained arm that you’re going to amputate to get rid of the problem.

Yucca Mountain is a problem and if I lived in Nevada, I’d be livid, but the issue that needs to be addressed is bigger than just one piece of land…what do we do with nuclear waste, a byproduct of an industry that Paul is very much in support of.

Not all parcels of public land are nuclear waste dumps…far from it. Many are National Forests and National Parks. Not only are they national treasures, they are incredible tourism draws. On an annual basis, National Parks provide about $125 million in direct revenue through entrance fees and the like. A good portion of that comes from international tourists. The state of Utah estimates that 40% of its National Park visitors are from other countries. It also makes the claim that 78% of international visitors call National Parks a destination while visiting the US. These same tourists stay in hotels, shop in local stores and eat at local restaurants. So, on top of the direct revenue, there is a massive financial boost to surrounding areas. In 2009 alone, Yellowstone alone added over 5,000 jobs and over $300 million to the local economy. The Grand Canyon provided even more.

Paul advocates giving them back to the states and while that might seem like a great idea, the Federal Government is doing a fine job of managing the Parks Service and boosting the local economies. These lands are National treasures and should be treated as such.

Even more frightening is that Paul advocates selling the lands off. He uses his home state of Texas as the model, where he says, “private owners” have “developed all the natural resources.” Paul went on to say “how wonderful it would be if land will be or should be returned to the states and then for the best parts sold off to private owners.”

Great, so we should drill for oil in Yellowstone, frack for natural gas in the Shenandoah National Parks or mine Mt. Rushmore? And who will that benefit the most? Exactly, the 1% and their corporations. So much for the “national” in “National Treasure.”

Sign up to have all the AddictingInfo you can handle delivered directly to your email here!

Help us get the word out!
Share on Google+Share on StumbleUponShare on RedditPin on PinterestShare on LinkedInShare on TumblrEmail this to someone

facebook comments:

5 Comments

  • Steve Nicholas

    Maybe he think’s we’ll find oil in Teddy Roosevelt’s head.

  • Mind boggling lunacy.

  • “Much is said on questions of this kind about the greatest good for the greatest number, but the greatest number is too often found to be number one. It is never the greatest number in the common meaning of the term that makes the greatest noise and stir on questions mixed with money. Complaints are made in the name of poor settlers and miners, while the wealthy corporations are kept carefully hidden in the background. Let right, commendable industry be fostered, but as to these Goths and Vandals of the wilderness who are spreading black death in the fairest woods God ever made, let the government up and at ‘em.”

    John Muir

  • NO!

    NO!NO!NO!NO!NO!NO!NO!NO!NO!NO!NO!NO!NO!NO!NO!

    The Wilderness that blanketed this land from 1 ocean to the other has been obliterated in the very short time that European man has been here. To repugnicans, it may appear that there is plenty of wilderness to go around, but their idea of Wilderness is a few museum pieces called National Parks.

    Species are dying at an alarming rate and the evolution of all biological diversity is coming to a screeching halt, evolution that needs the expanse of Wilderness in order to continue.

    Read “Confessions of an Eco-Warrior” by Dave Foreman

  • Bruce, millions of people go to national parks every year. I would hardly say that most people can’t afford it. Many are within driving distance and are very inexpensive if not completely free to visit. Not to mention, turning them over to the states they are in would not help the poor in any way. Ron Paul has to get over this “turn every decision over to the states” thing. We are not a collection of individual countries, we are a collection of individual states that make up a single country. There have to be some things that apply to everybody.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

x
Click "Like" to get the latest updates