facebook comments:

4 responses

  1. Riverside
    April 5, 2013

    At least he makes the sense that if you don’t cover birth control that should be balanced by not covering Viagra.

    • maryscottoconnor
      April 5, 2013

      No. They are nowhere near the same thing. Birth control is necessary; Viagra is not.

  2. Ronald Wall
    April 5, 2013

    A Republican with an idea that could work – what a surprise! Getting the rest of the party onboard is another story. If a private monopoly can do it, what is wrong with the government doing it? Of course, the Repukes will have a hard time understanding that. I would support this plan if for no other reason than it would probably be the only way we might get universal healthcare for all Americans.

  3. Moongrim
    April 5, 2013

    Makes a lot of sense, which is why it’ll NEVER happen.

    Republicans just simply don’t have the Cojones to do this.

Leave a Reply

You must be to post a comment.

Back to top
mobile desktop