Ham Demands Miley Cyrus Have Sex With Animals And Kids

When Miley Cyrus came out as gender fluid in a frank discussion of sexuality within Paper Magazine, she became the unexpected social activist for her generation. At 22, she has grown up in the public spotlight, hitting fame nearly 10 years ago with the Disney show Hannah Montana. Now, her simple philosophy of not judging others, embracing diversity and focusing on sexuality only being between consenting adults has landed her square in the lustful eyes of noted Creationist, Ken Ham.

In an epic fail of a blog, the man known for losing in a science debate against comedian Bill Nye tried to make a case that Ms. Cyrus’ position was such that her raping animals or children was a logical thing to do. When she discusses her sexuality, his thoughts turn immediately to animals.

Question for her: Why not involve an animal? On what basis does she decide that? Besides, if there’s no God and she’s just a result of evolution, then she is merely an animal anyway. And those she interacts with sexually are just animals—so why not any animals? In other words, she has decided to draw a line for some reason—but what reason?

He claims then it is only because of the Bible that any person does not have sex with every single dog, sheep or rooster she finds. But, never one to fail and prove how stupid he is, he then takes it to the next level.

Question for her: Why only those over the age of 18? On what basis did she decide that? If there’s no God, why have any age restriction? On what basis would she argue against pedophilia? Why not do whatever anyone wants to do?

In his tirade, he completely neglected to make note of the key word in her discussion of sexuality: consent.

An animal cannot grant consent. A child cannot grant consent.

Apparently, the idea of consent is foreign to Ken Ham, like many other evangelicals. After all, according to others in the evangelical movement, women are property, so rape cannot happen. Miley Cyrus has demonstrated an adult, mature understanding of human sexuality, while Ken Ham is effectively claiming that without pieces of papers with words written on it by some forgotten scholars thousands of years ago, he would go out and rape the nearest child or sheep he could find. As such he is in effect demanding that any people who do not believe in his teachings engage in the most vile of acts to harm others. But hey, to many within his movement, Miley Cyrus is just another piece of meat anyways, not a person at all.

Ken Ham’s position is such that people have to wonder, what is wrong with Ken Ham?

The reality is, Miley Cyrus has demonstrated a far more mature and adult concept of sexuality than Ken Ham. Indeed, she has demonstrated a far more biblically sound sexuality than Ken Ham, who continues to push concepts which should have been left behind in the dark ages. He hunts for passages which he can take out of concept and twist to meet his twisted viewpoint, not a biblical interpretation at all but a degrading, anti-Biblical heretical approach to human sexuality.

Miley Cyrus is a Baptist who continues to demonstrate far more wisdom than her few years would indicate possible. Ken Ham is a hack who rejects all which is Biblical in order to swindle people out of their hard earned money. After all, even within his criticism of Miley Cyrus, he takes the opportunity to hawk his sham of a “Noah’s Ark,” which is based not on anything in the Bible, but on a popular painting from the 1840’s. (In the Bible, the Ark is described as a squarish structure, lacking rudder or bow, unlike Ken Ham’s fiction)

Ken Ham has done nothing here than to demonstrate how much of a fraud he truly is. His understanding of the Bible is nearly nonexistent, and his statements in regard to Miley Cyrus only tells us that he is likely claiming to have a secret desire for animals or children.

Why do people even listen to him?

Featured image via Hannah Montana Season 4 Episode 6 screen capture