House GOP Strips LGBT, Native American Provisions In VAWA

Author: February 23, 2013 8:11 pm

Well, the Senate sent the Violence Against Women Act to the House and – I know this is going to surprise you – the Republicans in that body have stripped out the provisions in the act that they didn’t like. As if we needed any more proof that Republicans don’t give a damn about LGBT women and Native American women.

The House version of the bill has completely removed all mention of sexual orientation and gender identity. As a result, crisis centers that serve the LGBT community could be completely shut out of any federal grants. We know that the GOP hates women but this proves that they hate LGBT women even more.


The Huffington Post has provided a link to the House bill with a section-by-section analysis. Their writer Jennifer Bendery had this succinct analysis:

The House GOP bill entirely leaves out provisions aimed at helping LGBT victims of domestic violence. Specifically, the bill removes “sexual orientation” and “gender identity” from the list of underserved populations who face barriers to accessing victim services, thereby disqualifying LGBT victims from a related grant program. The bill also eliminates a requirement in the Senate bill that programs that receive funding under VAWA provide services regardless of a person’s sexual orientation or gender identity. (SOURCE)

The Senate bill’s provisions for the protection of Native American women has been a point of contention among a handful of Senate Republicans. They’ve been calling it “unconstitutional” and in a most insulting statement, Chuck Grassley insinuated that the Native American courts would be incapable of trying a white man fairly.

So the House decided that there should be a provision for an accused rapist/assaulter to take their case to federal court if the feel they are being “treated unfairly.” Oh, isn’t that just typical? Those poor beasts! Heaven forbid the men who beat and rape Indian women feel like they aren’t being treated fairly. I am stunned by this naked favoritism but not at all surprised by it. After all, bullies tend to take care of other bullies.

Washington Senator Patty Murray has been an advocate for the renewal of VAWA and since it was allowed to lapse, has been one of the most vocal proponents of renewing it with the LGBT and Native American protections. She says that the House version “a non-starter” and called on that most rare of animals, moderate Republicans, to stand up to the backwards members of their party. She told reporters:

“It’s not a compromise, it’s an unfortunate effort to exclude specific groups of women from receiving basic protections under the law… The protections included in the Senate for new communities of women are not bargaining chips that can be played with in order to appease the far right in their party. These are badly needed new tools to give women an escape from a life stunted by abuse…It’s time for moderate Republicans in the House to step up and finally force their leadership to stop ignoring the calls of women across the country.” (SOURCE)

Damn right, Patty. The Violence Against Women Act has reduced the incidence of domestic partner homicides. It has established community programs to help battered women. But there are still some men who live in the Stone Age when it comes to how they view women. As property. As lesser beings. As the weaker sex. I think we women have proven time and again that we are none of those things. Some men will just never get it. Can we please get them out of our government?


Photobucket      T. Steelman is a life-long Liberal. She has been writing online about politics since 2007. She lives in Western Washington with her husband, daughter, 2 cats and a small herd of alpacas. How can anybody be enlightened? Truth is, after all, so poorly lit…

Help us get the word out!
Share on Google+Share on StumbleUponShare on RedditPin on PinterestShare on LinkedInShare on TumblrEmail this to someone

facebook comments:

3 Comments

  • Anna Wilson on facebook – Yes, I was wrong about it being a Senate bill. Cole and Issa are House Republicans who apparently have their heads screwed on right. However, that does not change the fact that Ms. Caffey used the Violence Against Indian Women Act to claim that Ms. Steelman was lying in her blog about the VAWA(also implying that all Liberals are liars). She was still comparing apples and oranges. The quote I used was from the article she linked to. The VAWA was stripped of the tribal language and any reference to lesbians and gays. I don’t think Ms. Caffey read more than the first paragraph or two and jumped to the conclusion that it was about the House version of VAWA. She needs to get HER facts straight before she calls anyone a liar.

  • this war on women.

  • Leslie Wade Caffey: Perhaps YOU did not finish reading or understand the article in your link. First, the bill you are referring to was a Senate bill, not the House version of VAWA, which is what this blog is discussing. I quote: “The issue now becomes whether the House Republican leadership will take up the tribal bill, or continue to muddy the waters with constitutional questions, as some GOP House members did during last year’s debate and as some Republican Senate members have been doing this year.”

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

x
Click "Like" to get the latest updates